The outlines of target structures on medical imaging can be highly ambiguous. The uncertainty about the “true” outline is evident in high inter-rater variability of manual segmentations. So far, no method is available to identify cases likely to exhibit a high inter-rater variability. Here, we demonstrate that ground truth independent uncertainty metrics extracted from a MC dropout segmentation model developed on labels of only one rater correlate with inter-rater variability. This relationship can be used to identify ambiguous cases and flag them for more detailed review supporting consistent and reliable patient evaluation in research and clinical settings.
This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only; a login is required.