We conduct the first systematic evaluation of the performance of three widely used registration software toolkits (FLIRT from FSL, NiftyReg and ANTs employing Spinal Cord Toolbox) in an effort to outline a method for reliable co-registration between anatomical and quantitative (EPI-based) spinal cord MRI. We generate a diverse set of registration pipelines and rank them according to quality of co-registration metrics. We find that ANTs and NiftyReg outperform FLIRT, and we report heterogeneity of specifications for optimal co-registration among software toolkits.
This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only; a login is required.