Abstract #3977
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Radial and Circumferential Strain: comparison between SSFP feature tracking, MRI tagging, and speckle tracking Echocardiography
Qurain T Alshammari 1,2 , Wendy E Strugnell 3 , Jonathan Chan 4 , Darryl J Burstow 5 , and Christian Hamilton-Craig 1,6
1
Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University
of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia,
2
College
of Applied Medical Science, Hail, Saudi Arabia,
3
The
Richard Slaughter Centre of Excellence in Cardiac MRI,
The Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland, Australia,
4
Heart
Foundation Research Centre, Griffith University, Gold
Coast, Australia,
5
Department
of Echocardiography, The Prince Charles Hospital,
Qeensland, Australia,
6
University
of Washington, Seattle, United States
Myocardial deformation imaging with strain imaging using
speckle tracking Echocardiography (STE) and
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance tagging now has been
applied for assessment of myocardial deformation.
Recently, feature tracking on standard steady state free
precession imaging (SSFPFT) has been developed for the
assessment myocardial deformation. The purpose of this
study was to compare circumferential and radial strain
by feature tracking on SSFP cine CMR images as compared
to SPAMM tagging technique and speckle tracking
echocardiography. The result support that the radial and
circumferential strain with SSFP-FT has a good agreement
with tagging and Echocardiography methodologies.
This abstract and the presentation materials are available to members only;
a login is required.
Join Here
