Meeting Banner
Abstract #4805

Is It "Safe" to Use a Population Arterial Input Function for DCE-MRI in Mice?

Mary E. Loveless1,2, Jane Halliday3, Carsten Liess4, Lei Xu5, Richard Dortch, 2,6, Jennifer Whisenant, 2,7, John C. Waterton4, John C. Gore, 2,6, Thomas E. Yankeelov, 2,6

1Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; 2Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; 3Imaging, Translational Sciences, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield , Cheshire, United Kingdom; 4Imaging, Translational Sciences, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom; 5Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; 6Radiology and Radiological Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; 7Chemical & Physical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States


In the quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI data, the contrast agent concentration time course in the blood plasma (AIF) is required. In this study we compare parameters resulting from two common DCE-MRI models driven by both individual and population derived AIFs in mice for two different contrast agents, Gd-DTPA and P846. The goal is to determine how the individual and population AIF derived parameters compare and how this affects the number of animals that would be needed in a given study.